R1

 You must allow this participation, relaxation to let the unseen echo over the mountains or desert as illusion and not step in front of it and call –well what do you call to the dragon when you have to search for a way to spell the word, well, as the brain  began all at once to do with this which in the end was not a kind of dream, but it was imperfect. Instead of not all at once or not all together I said it was all at once and all together, but none could see, no not one of the lowing heard, except grumbling and a chuff. To that end the difference between seen and the unseen was a disrespect of  rituals, wisdom and myth as true, disrespect of any deep mythical truth of the subcon and the uncon as a misdom of malebolge, a fraud home of all the classical frauds, and source of the source of ill of the human mind spread over the myth of every culture in every language, revered as universal myth when it was nothing but the prison sharkles of the man, the mind forged tyger shadow, terra cotta fraud diamonds of light that shine into the shattered man’s mind this excrement of the other world.

Rhinoceros across the piano. On Ludwig's hand and tree, question language is the closest we come to question thought, which is always something else besides language, but which we cannot know -- it is swift transits of light. So to pick up this language game of the recognition of nouns where we all agree that a hand is  a hand and a tree is a tree, and don’t dare ask in the middle of this, what is a violet, as Ludwig does, or a table, because this is the social order of words and the political where ever noun has a clear boundary between what it is and what it is not.

At least that was good enough in the world that then existed, when trees were not cell phone towers, palms and pines, and they grew in school yards and so it “would be reasonable to doubt that was a real tree”. No reasonable person would doubt it is the same as the tree or the hand because no reasonable persons exist any more than the tree does alloyed by its aluminum soil, itself a doubt by that class that can find no clear boundary between male and female, nations, worlds. “every language game is based on words and objects benign recognition again that a chair is as inexorable as 2x2=4. All Certainty is in doubt. With is, it is.

This, this is a hand is in doubt, like the cell phone tree, the genome tree, the paradu tree, and that is why we have to investigation the investigation. As he says, if a patient told a doc this is a hand, which has been needed among specialists who cannot recognize the foot, as much a joke as the tree joke or the hand joke or saying anything in the middle of a conversation that is out of sequence, like if I said that a rhinoceros ran across the piano. That might be taken as a joke, the best way as Ludwigen says he might have been thinking about it the whole time, saying good morning out of sequence, or maybe he doesn’t know he is saying it. So it might be said he has been thinking of it the whole time and just then blurted it out of seq, or maybe some days later he tells her a rhino ran across the piano, but didn’t blurt it out at the time, all of which shows that out of sequence violets in the lang game are as much as saying the obvious. I knew your name was Frank the whole time and saying good morning in the middle of a converse, except with the cell trees and now the hybrid hand we well ask what the status of rhino on the piano is-- a thought or actually seen? -- and if seen than how, corporeally, spiritually?

Well it was actually seen, apropos of nothing, so that days later it was modeled and fired and glazed and fired and now it is out of the kiln and sits on the table being too big for the piano even in this reduced state and we can ask does it look like the rhino on the piano which only existed for a second? Of course this is real, but it was real enough to become real so it was real then too. But it does havoc to the game of recognition, and sequence and reasonable  information vs nonsense so we hardly know about the reasonable or the reason, the tree or the hand. “Indeed it it is open to doubt whether that is a hand. why isn’t it also open to doubt whether I am a human being who is informing the doctor of this hand?” (60e)  for to recognize the hand among the labyrinth of robots makes the hand joke real, and the cell tower makes the tree joke real and if these are real then what in the world is the rhino on the piano but a joke we haven’t told yet, are telling now. Oh here is my tree joke:

Leaves! Adam had’em.

My mother in law laughed for days about that. But now there is a sequel:

TREES! Adam had’em.

Out of seq again,  phone rings, out of seq, to question Ludwing’s reasonable man. So when you go to the doc don’t say this hand. Duperflous and apsurd we don’t have to insectigate the language game, but if it is not the hand that I doubt but the word of the opposite case where it is not the word that I doubt but the hand. So I leave you with that. Good morning.